How can you get their phone number and address? Look up phone numbers with ZabaSearch. ZabaSearch is a fairly accurate phone number lookup service. It offers a free way to look up people's phone numbers you can narrow it down by state , along with premium services for reverse phone number and social security number lookups. I say "fairly accurate" because while ZabaSearch's database includes listed and unlisted numbers, it's hit-or-miss when it comes to cell phone numbers--and who doesn't have a cell phone these days?
WhitePages appears to update its database more frequently, as it found a recent address change of mine that ZabaSearch missed within the last year.
Answering your Client’s Needs
However, it does not list unlisted numbers. WhitePages also offers a premium, reverse phone number lookup, and will show you the location of the phone. Of course, this is simply the location of the phone's origin, and is based on the phone's area code--when I look up my phone number, for example, it says my phone is likely located in Conway, South Carolina. This is incorrect, as my phone is currently located in California, but my phone's area code is from South Carolina.
Finding an address or phone number is child's play. Only when you're looking for criminal and public records do things start to get interesting. If you want to know if your hot coworker has ever been divorced, or if your neighbor might be running a drug ring out of her apartment, this is how you can find out. From felonies to parking tickets, you can find it at CriminalSearches. CriminalSearches allows you to do a criminal history check on people by name.
You can also narrow down the search by city and state, though these are not required fields. It does cost money to see the details, and you should remember that some states include minor traffic citations as offenses--so they may not really be "criminals," per se.
If you're looking for other types of public records--such as marriage records, birth records, or death records-- SearchSystems offers access to free public records sites. You can search by type of record, zip code, state, county and state, or city and state, or you can search international records by region.
There's a whole industry of mugshot websites that post every arrested person's picture on the web for anyone to see. You can imagine how harmful that is if you're trying to get a job or a date. And there's nothing you can do to get that photo taken down aside from paying some of the mugshot sites to do so, which seems a lot like extortion to me. Wired did a great story on this whole extortion thing. You're always weighing two competing interests: on the one hand, you have the First Amendment rights of newspapers and websites to publish factually accurate things and the public's right to learn about those things; on the other hand, you have the individual's interest in privacy and moving on with his or her life.
These are both incredibly important interests, but at present, the scales are tipped overwhelmingly in favor of the First Amendment. I'd argue for more balance. We've reached a point where the right to publish is in direct conflict with many judicial actions: for example, a court of law decides that someone's record was worthy of expungement, which basically erases the charge from public view, but a newspaper can leave up that same person's arrest record in the online police blotter. I support an absolute right to be forgotten in certain sensitive cases, such as those where a record was expunged or a person was acquitted following an arrest.
You shouldn't be doomed to take those things to the grave. Is anybody doing this particularly well? And, is anybody doing a particularly poor job with our information? In contrast, an opt-out policy means that a company collects and uses your information without you agreeing to it beforehand, and you have to make the effort of going in and opting yourself out after the fact.
Most companies automatically collect your data without your consent. Opt-in policies are rare. One well-known example of the two involves facial recognition: Facebook rolled out its facial recognition by default, opting every member in without their consent. As you can imagine, people weren't happy about this.
Even if you understand how Facebook uses your information one day and almost no one does, because of how complicated their policies are , you won't understand how they use your information the next time they change their policies. They have hundreds of pages of info on each person, from pokes to de-friendings to event RSVP's.
They have a massive database of facial information: every time you're tagged, they store more information about your face, like how you look in glasses and different types of lighting. Even if you limit your privacy settings to "friends of friends," you're exposing yourself to an average of , people. Facebook is privacy's worst nightmare. Another thing many people don't understand about Facebook is that Facebook Connect and Like buttons are tracking devices. If you see Facebook buttons on a website, Facebook is able to track you on that site. They can track you even if you're logged out.
Facebook is such a big part of so many of our lives and it offers some great things, but people don't realize that it's not a free service: you pay for it with your personal data. Facebook's currency is your personal information, which it sells to advertisers. Bottom line: Facebook is a for-profit company and they'll do everything they can to get more of your information, whether it's by making it nearly impossible to delete your account, changing their privacy policies every month, or partnering with more and more third-party sites with whom they share all of your data.
Do the implications reach something as large and ubiquitous as Facebook or is that a different fight?
One click and you're deleted for good, like the Do Not Call registry. It should be easy, quick, and long-lasting. Right now the burden is on the consumer to not only realize that they're listed on hundreds of websites, but to wade through tons of red tape to figure out if a deletion method exists, and if so, what it is.
And then the companies won't comply with requests, or they'll put information back up, like BeenVerified is doing. These companies are toying with consumers and profiting off their information at the same time. I hope that the FTC complaint pushes the burden from consumers to companies.
As much as I'd like to see better privacy on Facebook, I think that social networks are a different world than people search websites. My complaint could make more people aware of privacy issues in general, which could affect their perceptions of Facebook, but I don't think there's much of a direct relationship between the two. The first tip is a general one: don't give out your personal information unless you absolutely have to.
Start being vigilant about your data. An everyday example is when you buy a shirt at at the mall and they ask for your phone number and email address. Is that info necessary to buy a shirt? Ther e were more complications to come. Reznor presumed that weeks before the CD reached Wal-Mart and Best Buy, someone would upload it to the BitTorrent sites, which his most avid fans would be carefully monitoring.
So he planted hints in the music — a few seconds recorded out of phase on "The Great Destroyer," for instance.
Background Check Services | Advertising, Marketing, & PR | Crimcheck
Played on a monaural device, the music briefly canceled itself out, leaving nothing except a barely audible voice saying something like "red horse vector. Surprisingly, though, no one was uploading the album. Reznor had assumed it would hit the peer-to-peer sites by mid-March, but at the end of that month there was still no sign of it. Without the music, only a handful of new clues were coming out. Trent was stunned. And the whole time we were thinking, 'When is so m eone go i ng to stea l this a l bum? Reznor would like to make one th i ng about the Year Zer o game perfectly clear: "It's not fucki n g marketing.
I'm not trying to sell anything.
Why you're seeing an ad
For a while, he didn't even tell his label what he was d o ing. But the game was extremely effective at generating excitement. Every time a song was leaked, the message boards were swamped. By the time the album hit store shelves in A p ril, 2. The buzz was so great that Int e rscope chair Jimmy Iovine — Reznor's label boss at Universal Music at the time — called Weisman to talk about buying 42 Entertainment.
From 42's perspective, it hardly matters w het h er you call the game "marketing" o r not. What matters is that someone — Reznor, Microsoft, Disney — writes a c heck. And, for now, the checks gener a lly come from companies trying to se ll something. As a r e sult, many ARG d evelopers want to break out of marketing entirely and find another way to make money. Novel i s t s, film directors, and television producers get to tell their own stories; w h y not ARG-makers? So far, however, no o n e has manage d to create an ARG that can sustain itself through advertising, subscripti o n f ees, or any other model.
But though 50, people in 92 countries registered for the game, the cards turned out to be difficult and expensive to produce. Last Ju n e, not long after the cube was unearthed i n a forest in England, a planned second season was abruptly canceled.
As the album's release date approached, the game hit the peer-to-peer sites and regained its momentum. Elan Lee, the game's chief designer, s u ggested an explosive finale: Stage a surprise concert and b low up a building on the way out. A building? Reznor was awestruck: "These are my kind of people! Blowing up a building wasn't practical, so they came up with s omething else. On April 13, all the players w h o had signed up at a subversive site called Open Source Resistance we r e invited to gather beneath a mural i n Hollywood.
Some of those who showed up w e re given cell phones and told to k eep them on at all t i mes. Five days later, the pho n es ran g. The players were told to report to a parking lot, where t hey were loaded onto a ram-shackle bus wit h blacked-out windows. The bus delivered them a t twilight to wha t appeared to be an abandoned warehouse near some railroad tracks.
Armed men patrolled the roof. The odd player s were led up a ramp and into a large, dark room w h ere the leader of Open Source Resistance actually an actor gave a sp e ech about the importance of making themselves heard. Then they w ere led through a maze of rooms and deposited in front of — a row of a mps? With the s udden crack of a drumbeat, Nine Inch Nails materialized onstage and broke into "The Beginning of the End," a song they had never before played in the US. He got out one, two, three, four more songs before the SWAT team arrived. Then, as flashing li g hts and flash bombs filled the room, men in ri o t gear stormed the stage.
The bus sped them back to the parkin g lot and the cars that would take them safely home. But before they drove away, they were told they'd be contacted again. Now that the album is out, the game has gone cold. But we could buy new minutes at any point. Skip Article Header. Skip to: Start of Article.
Photo: Robert Maxwell.